Was The World Created In Six Literal Days?: A Short Story

January 14, 2013 — 5 Comments

“But you must believe earth was made in six literal days–it’s biblical!”

“No, it’s not. It’s biblical to believe it may be millions of years old.”

“Oh, stop it, Jack. You know that’s a load of rubbish. It is clearly written in the Bible that God made the world in six days!” Ed looked at his friend with determination in his eyes, and continued, “It can’t be any clearer!”

“Ed,” Jack said, “who wrote Genesis, the book you’re quoting to me?”

“Moses,” he replied quickly, and proudly.

“And who wrote psalm 90?”

This time Ed wasn’t so quick. He had no idea, and it frustrated him to have to say so, especially to Jack. “Not sure, why do you ask?”

“Because, I happen to know who wrote it, for it is attributed to Moses. The very same Moses who wrote Genesis. Now, do you know what Moses wrote in Psalm 90, and what the Apostle Peter quoted to the early church?”

Ed gave a blank stare.

“Here’s what the Apostle Peter said: ‘But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.’ and let me quote what Moses said to you: ‘For a thousand years in your sight are like a day that has just gone by, or like a watch in the night.’ Those, my friend, are the words of the same man who wrote that the Lord made the world in six days. So, although he wrote in Genesis that God made the world in six days, we know from Scripture that he didn’t mean it literally, it could have been six days, but it could have also been six thousand years, or six million years, the point was not the actual duration, but that God was the sole creator, and he was the completer of the creation of the world.”

“Jack, you just want it both ways, you can’t believe in science and God.”

“Hey, don’t sidestep what I’ve just shared! Don’t try to get angry and brand be faithless because you want to avoid what I just told you; be a man, tell me–isn’t it possible, and that from a biblical perspective, that the world was created in a much larger period of time than six literal days?”

“NO!” Ed screamed.”

“Why not? I just explained how it is all together possible.”

“Because, if you don’t believe in a literal six days of creation you aren’t even Christian!”

“And I suppose you think that’s biblical too?”

“Yes, I do!”

“Ed, you believe your pastor and his obsession with a six-day-creation theology. That’s what you believe, but don’t think you are simply believing the Bible. If anything, you’re rejecting the Bible in order to maintain your current belief.”

“You are the rejector, Jack. You are the one who wants to be a scientist instead of a Christian, not me!”

“Ed, you’re just side stepping the real point here. Again, what did Moses say?”

“He said six days! He said six, literal days!”

“No, he didn’t – you have added this word ‘literal’ into the story, don’t you see that? You’re adding information into the Bible that’s not even there!”

“Liar!” Ed screamed.

“Calm down,” Jack replied.

“Scientist!” Ed screamed again.

View a list of my books on amazon *here*

Enter your email to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • mark

    OK, normally I’m a Jack. On this one, I’m probably more aligned with Ed. Not regarding his black/white categorisation of Jack as an unbeliever, but on the seven days thing. I concede t.hat nobody knows whether it was seven 24-hour periods, or seven billion years. I’ included day 7 purposefully. What I do believe is that everything was created perfect and has not evolved. In fact, I believe everything is “devolving” since the Fall. Maybe I’m more of a “JackEd”?!

  • Kay

    Just a thought, without doing any digging in the original language. Is it possible that when Moses spoke of a day as a thousand years and a thousand years as a day, it was the only way he could grasp or portray infinite eternal “time” in the confines of man’s finite understanding of time? That it’s not really 1000 to 1 or 1 to 1000, but so far out of our grasp of understanding on earth?

  • http://sukofamily.org/ Caleb

    Honestly I believe in the 6 literal days but I also believe in grace. It’s not something I’m willing to stick my head on the chopping block for and certainly not something that I would consider worth dividing fellowship over.

  • http://www.facebook.com/maddyeline Maddy Floss

    Lol.. that’s an interesting debate! I’ve never really thought about it that way..but I guess Moses made the comparison of a day spent in the presence of God with the duration of a 1000 years.. because of the childlike joy and efficiency that God empowers His people with..manuvering in the rhymn of light, light, easy, easy, pleasurable and swift :)

  • Jennifer

    The problem with attempting to interpret the Bible so it lines up with science (well, the science of today anyway) is that it appears to unravel the rest of our theology, I think. God CAN do whatever He wants and could have created however he wanted. It’s interesting that He, dictating to whoever wrote Genesis (people think Moses) that He was creating and “evening and morning, the first day…” instead of saying, “It took MANY MANY years to do this. Isn’t it about that simple? It took 6 days or it took MANY THOUSANDS/MILLIONS of days. Why wouldn’t we expect that what God told Moses was put in the Bible?

    If it’s 6 literal days, we know that God creates aged things. It didn’t say he planted seeds or created two babies. The notion is that things were created grown and complete. (A bunch of baby animals obviously wouldn’t work at least, no parents to care for them…) Jesus, in the NT, makes bread and fish multiply by passing the planting, harvesting, and preparing of bread, and bypassing fish gestation, egg laying, and fish growth. So the “age of the earth” (as questionable as it is) could seem older simply because God created things with a “head start” sooo…

    Adam and Eve could live there. Because we believe Adam and Eve were literal right, even if you ascribe to humans sharing a common ancestor with the monkey and even further back fish and slime? :p So at which point did what God “created” that was evolving become the Adam and Eve he had a personal relationship with? Conscious of free will? There was suffering and death of millions of mid-way evolving species prior to sin? Then why did both Jesus and Paul (Paul is human, he could mess up…Jesus would not) talk about Adam as historical GIVEN figure?

    Lots of unanswered questions from those who want to shrug off (it seems) the age of the earth. Yes, God could have done it however he wanted. But seems like he told us how he did it and it lines up with that Christians seem to believe otherwise (that Jesus is not a liar, that Adam introduced sin and Jesus as new Adam redeemed us, etc).

    Sounds like Ed isn’t very informed of a coherent argument. :)